Skip to main content

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

 

In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments.[1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards others, nothing substantial occurs to stop this behavior.[2]

This fairly recent comment is quite disheartening in terms of creating a welcoming and productive archival environment for both staff members and researchers. What can be done to effectively mitigate the culture of senior staff members who resort to harsh treatment of less experienced archivist due to racist, misogynistic, and prejudice behavior? In recent years, and in a myriad of careers, employees of institutions and companies are required to attend meetings and complete online modules that promote comfortable and inclusive work environments, but are these activities truly enough? Will the archival realm as well as other historic spheres take further action to diminish the realities of hostile behavior stemming from privileged and or tenured staff? If archives are to continue engaging more inclusive communities, they themselves might be successful in drawing them in by establishing both open access to a variety of material whilst displaying friendly, diverse, and educational workings amongst their coworkers.


[1] Blumenthal, Karl-Rainer; Griesinger, Peggy; Kim, Julia Y.; Peltzman, Shira; and Steeves, Vicky (2020)

What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs

from Practitioners’ Perspectives, Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies: Vol. 7, Article 13.

Available at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol7/iss1/13, 17.

[2] Ibid., What’s Wrong With Digital Stewardship, 17.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post #6: Being Attentive to Culturally-Sensitive Collections in Special Collection and Archival Spaces

  In Ellen M. Ryan’s Identifying Culturally Sensitive American Indian Material in a Non-tribal Institution (2014), the accessibility to the contents of a collection pertaining to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho found within the Special Collections and Archives of Idaho State University are called into question. This collection, the “J.A. Youngren Papers,” includes photographs of Shoshone-Bannock practices such as the “Sun Dance” (a ceremony of the Great Plains tribes) taken and acquired by the university in the early 20 th century without the consent of Shoshone-Bannock members. [1] In 2013, an undergraduate student and sun dancer tasked with processing and housing these photographs took note of the rituals captured within the photographs and the problematic nature of displaying these photographs online without the consent of tribal members. He thus brought this concern up to the Head of Special Collections of ISU and the photos were soon after ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #4: Original Vs. Copy: What Do You Prefer?

  James M. O’Toole’s On the Idea of Permanence examined archival topics such as archival language and its importance, the discord of what “permanence” is in an archival sphere, the shift from oral records to written records as well as the importance placed on both forms of recording history, and several other important facets of the archivist’s profession. Though I found these topics extremely enlightening and vital, the topic that many of us can relate to is the idea of the original document vs. a copy. In many archives, documents are digitized to allow more access to certain documents while also safeguarding a document’s condition. As a researcher myself, I like utilizing original documents for research, but I understand that that can not always be arranged. Having said this, a quote that O’Toole presents in the article struck me as important in analyzing the research process and digitization of documents moving forward. This quote was from the preservation researcher William J....
Post a Comment
Read more