Skip to main content

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

 

In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments.[1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards others, nothing substantial occurs to stop this behavior.[2]

This fairly recent comment is quite disheartening in terms of creating a welcoming and productive archival environment for both staff members and researchers. What can be done to effectively mitigate the culture of senior staff members who resort to harsh treatment of less experienced archivist due to racist, misogynistic, and prejudice behavior? In recent years, and in a myriad of careers, employees of institutions and companies are required to attend meetings and complete online modules that promote comfortable and inclusive work environments, but are these activities truly enough? Will the archival realm as well as other historic spheres take further action to diminish the realities of hostile behavior stemming from privileged and or tenured staff? If archives are to continue engaging more inclusive communities, they themselves might be successful in drawing them in by establishing both open access to a variety of material whilst displaying friendly, diverse, and educational workings amongst their coworkers.


[1] Blumenthal, Karl-Rainer; Griesinger, Peggy; Kim, Julia Y.; Peltzman, Shira; and Steeves, Vicky (2020)

What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs

from Practitioners’ Perspectives, Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies: Vol. 7, Article 13.

Available at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol7/iss1/13, 17.

[2] Ibid., What’s Wrong With Digital Stewardship, 17.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post #8: Important Discussions of Copyright and Digitization in Archival Spaces

  This week’s discussion in Temple’s Archives and Manuscripts course concerning the protocols of copyright in the archival realm is one that many a researcher might find vital. As a traditional historian, I tend to utilize physical books and monographs. However, I often utilize more contemporary research materials for my papers such as online articles, audio, and countless of other digital sources to input into my papers and assignments. I, like many other researchers, would like to avoid being guilty of copyrighting another’s work and or utilizing a work when it should be restricted or was wrongfully, whether intentionally or unintentionally, made to be used publicly. In Dharma Akmon’s Only With Your Permission: How Rights Respond (Or Don’t Respond) to Requests to Display Archival Materials Online , it is disclosed that many archives try to take multiple measures to ensure that works with complicated rights issues are not digitized to mitigate potential cases of copyright. [1] Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #7: Archival Ethics and Decisions on Document Preservation

  After reading Timothy D. Pyatt’s article The Harding Affair Letters: How One Archivist Took Every Measure Possible To Ensure Their Preservation , I pondered upon the way that the letters were handled by archivist Ken Duckett and also how letters disclosing an affair of someone out of the public eye may have been treated during Duckett’s lifetime. For instance, if Duckett received a box which included documents about the life of someone who was a well-respected figure in their hometown, but not so much on a national or universal scale, would the same measures to preserve the Harding letters be illustrated in the case of this hypothetical figure? Would these measures have been different in Duckett’s time vs. what would occur today? Pyatt discloses that Duckett believed in preserving the letters to allow a fuller understanding of Harding’s narrative. [1] In contrast to the Harding letters, it can be argued that the letters of people who are not affiliated with political or public-r...
Post a Comment
Read more