The confrontation of
uncomfortable but necessary historical topics which arise in present-day historic
sites are offered in Brown, Gutierrez, Okmin, and McCullough’s article Desegregating
Conversations about Race and Identity in Culturally Specific Museums. Here,
the authors explain that in museums such as the Asian Art Museum and the Museum
of the African Diaspora (both located in San Francisco, CA), museum educators
struggle to determine which ways they can present museum exhibitions and
historical discussions in a means to promote open and honest discussions
without leaving out certain narratives or offending the museum’s visitors. One complaint
that people held with the Asian Art Museum was its lack of interpretation upon
how the objects of Asian origin were obtained, which would require museum
educators to speak of colonization upon Asian nations which lead to these artifacts
being held in California[1]. From what I understand,
topics of colonization often make visitors of a certain demographic
uncomfortable because they often feel like they themselves are at fault for the
theft of certain artifacts. However, I do believe that by allowing open
discussions about interpretations of the artifacts as well as how the objects
came to be displayed in the Asian Art Museum, museum educators are actively
working to promote more open and productive conversations about previously
discomforting topics thus allowing historic sites to be a safe place for
diverse historical discussions.
In a similar frame of
cultural and racial historical topics in historic sites, I really enjoyed
Margaret Sanford and Janaye Evan’s presentation in the conference Death to
Museums UnConference in which they
discuss the outright existence of White Supremacy evident in the exhibition’s
practices, mass incarceration, and lack of diversity in the exhibition and museum
programmers of the Eastern State Penitentiary in Pennsylvania. Sanford and Evans carefully explain the history of the penitentiary and the lack of
attention given to the minorities who have been imprisoned here. One remark
that I appreciated from this conference was Evan’s conclusion that most visitor’s
of the museum are White and middle class and that the penitentiary’s educators
are often not properly trained to engage with visitors who could become hostile
with them due to subject matter[3]. I felt that this was an
important reality to note, because though topics which involve race and
systematic inequality are more than necessary, they are not often expressed to
the extent that they should be in historic sites and the museum interpreters
who speak of racial content are known to be verbally assaulted by visitors. As
a public historian, I would want to be adequately trained on a variety of topics that
encompass the history of a site, no matter how harsh or uncomfortable. I would
also like to know how to speak with visitors who may have a differing opinion
that I may have. When I learned that this training was not efficiently given to
the educators of the Eastern State Penitentiary, I was honestly surprised. In
this case, I really did appreciate Evan’s and Sanford’s honest and thorough
discussion of the penitentiary and their push to eradicate White Supremacy in
this site.
Throughout Timothy Patterson’s
work documented in Historians, Archivists, and Museum Educators as Teacher
Educators: Mentoring Preservice History Teachers at Cultural Institutes, the
practices of study participants and youth involvement in historic sites show
that historic sites can either help foster broader insight into historical
topics or hinder visitor’s from certain interpretations. One thing that stuck
out to me in Patterson’s article was the observation of the teacher named Peter
who admitted that before having his experience touring a museum with his mentor
(a museum professional named Scott), he had thought of museums as just places
which housed historical artifacts; after seeing the work of curators and the
way a site’s exhibition design can really help them relay a certain narrative,
Peter gained valuable knowledge as to how historic sites are model sites for learning[5]. I am happy that Peter was
illuminated to the ability of museums to be strong sites of education and learning,
as I have known people who like Peter, downplayed the capability of museum education
to teach certain historical narratives. I am an advocate for helping museum visitors
understand the quality and significance of what museum and historic sites have
to offer them as far as historical education, and thus appreciate studies like
the one Peter partook in.
[1] Brown, Gutierrez, Okmin, and Susan
McCullough. Desegregating Conversations about Race and Identity in
Culturally Specific Museums. Journal of Museum Education: 42:2, 2017, 122.
[3] Evans, Janaye and Margaret Sanford.
Between Apathy and Action: The Educator and the Museum Mission, A Case Study
at Eastern State Penitentiary. Death to Museums UnConference: August 2,
2020. https://youtu.be/QlkLGgyk0Ss?t=11328
[4] https://www.planetizen.com/news/2019/06/104769-eastern-state-penitentiary-class-about-past-speaks-present-and-future
[5] Patterson, Timothy. Historians,
Archivists, and Museum Educators as Teacher Educators: Mentoring Preservice
History Teachers at Cultural Institutes. Journal of Teacher Education, 2020,
5.
Comments
Post a Comment