The Oral History Manual
by Barbara w. Sommer and Mary Kay Quinlan explores in a very descriptive light
what oral history is, the ways that oral history contribute to academic and
non-academic realms, and what the practice of oral history entails. Sommer and
Quinlan also write of the differences between oral history and other historical
practices and the proper procedures to both prepare for and conduct an oral
history project. Some of the procedures written in the manual include how to secure
adequate funding to pursue and complete an oral history project, the technology
needed during the project’s interview process, the legality and laws present
between the narrator(s) and interviewer(s), and other important information about
oral history practices. What resonated with me throughout Sommer and Quinlan’s
manual was the description of ethics in which historians and laypeople taking
on oral history must follow, such as ensuring that no “defamatory” remarks are
made about the narrators of an oral history interview[1]. I believe this statement both
mitigates possible lawsuits against historians and promotes the open-mindedness
that public historians should practice globally. Similarly, Sommer and Quinlan
mention that oral history is often uncomfortable, especially when it involves
the topic of race, gender, or social class. This discomfort is seen in one of
the manual’s documented oral histories in which a Black woman was reluctant to
speak to a White person about her formally enslaved family member and racial
tension in the Midwest; her hesitancy changed when her White friend and interviewer
acknowledged the discomfort she as a White person felt while conversing about racial
history and her willingness to take in her friend’s history no matter how
uncomfortable[2].
The oral history which ensued between these two women may have been difficult, but
present historians can learn from this moment as we continue to break down our
own social walls and learn to converse about racism: a deeply entrenched facet
of contemporary American society.
In Sherri Tucker’s Queer
Episodes in Music and Modern Identity, Tucker features the histories of female
American musicians of the early 20th century who chose to disclose and/or
keep secret certain realities of their sexuality. Tucker’s oral histories with
the female musicians reveal that during the peak of their careers, 20th
century female band members often kept their sexuality a secret due to the
highly constrictive atmosphere of American society. Tucker also learns along
her oral history journey that though many female band members did not disclose
their sexuality, this strategy of silence was in the case of lesbian band
members an effective and powerful one[3]. Tucker’s encounters with
female musicians who refused to overtly disclose their sexuality was both a
valuable lesson to her of the touchiness of certain topics while conducting
oral history projects and a very enlightening history for me as a woman today.
Living in the 21st century, though I may encounter resistance and disapproval
for my sexual preferences, it would not marginalize me to the same extent that
it would the women Tucker interviewed. The ability that I have to disclose my
sexuality today and not have to worry about discrimination in the workforce and
other aspects of my life is a contrast to the women in Tucker’s oral history
project, and that fact is one that historians can take into account to
calibrate historical change in America’s current environment.
Leon Fink also examines the topic of race in his text When Community Comes Homes to Roost: The
Southern Milltown as Lost Cause while he denotes the tendencies of
Cooleemee, North Carolina to mask historical inequalities and hardships with heritage
and the town’s endeavor to undermine the existence of minorities in Cooleemee
history. In this text, Fink writes of Lynn Wells Rumley and Jim Rumley, the founders
of the Cooleemee Historical Association (CHA) who though claiming to uphold
anti-racist ideology were known by both Black and White Cooleemee citizens to
be racist. Denoting the Rumley’s racism, a Black Cooleemee resident named
Bessie Wilson stated that she believed that Lynn Wells Rumley was not
interested in incorporating any Blacks into CHA leadership positions, and that
with Rumley’s blatant display of the Confederate flag at her historic site, she
was surely a racist[5].
Bessie’s unrest of a White historian who is unwilling to collaborate with Black
historians and her disgust at the display of the Confederate flag is a mindset
which is prominent in many people today. I and other historians should consider
that despite the change of century, people still want to rid American society of
the Confederate flag and to have racial inclusiveness within historical sites.
America still has a long journey until racial inclusiveness is accomplished, but
with readings like Fink’s, we can try to understand why the historical
connotations of emblems such as the Confederate flag create social
unrest.
[1]Sommer, Barbara W., and Mary Kay
Quinlan. The Oral History Manual. (Lanham, MD: Rowman et Littlefield),
2009, 26.
[2] Ibid., 65.
[3] Tucker, Sherrie. Queer Episodes in Music and Modern Identity, ed. Fuller, Sophie and Lloyd Whitesell. (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press) 2002, 302.
[5] Fink, Leon. "When Community
Comes Homes to Roost: The Southern Milltown as Lost Cause." Journal
of Social History 40, no. 1 (2006): 119-45. Accessed September 15,
2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4491858.
Comments
Post a Comment