Skip to main content

Perseverance and Variety in American Public Memory

 

In Carolyn Kitch’s Pennsylvania in Public Memory: Reclaiming the Industrial Past, Kitch researches Pennsylvania’s steel industry from America’s Industrial Revolution era to the 21st century to determine the ways Pennsylvania’s labor history is recalled today. Through a multi-disciplinary approach of research, oral history, and ethnography, Kitch discovers the passion and concern placed towards Pennsylvanian labor history and labor representation. Kitch found that by making history relatable, pertinent, and noticeable today, Pennsylvanian historical sites succeeded in capturing visitor attention. One site, the Heritage Discovery Center, created connections from past citizens to people today by allowing visitors upon entry to select a card presenting an immigrant whose story they could follow throughout the site[1]. With personal attention given to past Pennsylvanian immigrants, the museum succeeded in producing an interesting and sentimental way in which the public could not only view history but relate to the everyday struggles of people making a life for themselves.

Within the article How Do We Define Public History, the NCHP provides descriptions of the practice of public history. The NCHP states that public historians try to make public history useful and relevant in the eyes of the public and that many take a collaborative approach to research and present history [2]. I perceived in Kitch’s research of Pennsylvanian labor a very collective means to unveil public memory. Her inclusiveness of historical places ranging from large corporations like Yuengling who give visitors tours to show the craftsmanship of their bottles to small-scale attention like visiting rural Pennsylvania to connect with past laborers who relied on rural life to sustain the state are influential; each example successfully encapsulates the consideration Pennsylvanians show towards labor history and the measures to extend its existence in the state.
                                                  [3]   

 Rosenzweig and Thelen’s book The Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life presents a series of phone call interviews in the 90s between college students and random Americans which revealed details of Americans’ outlook on history. The interviewees were asked questions like which American historical figures and events were important/unimportant to them, which life events remind the interviewees of history, what historical narratives should be taught in American society, and which histories are most significant to American society. With these interviews, Rosenzweig and Thelen found some very notable trends of the interviewees, such as White interviewees believing that American society was declining, whereas African Americans and Native Americans focused on historical events which brought their communities progress[4]. The findings of certain historical narratives and people being more important to one group than another suggests that Americans of diverse groups are often inspired through personal life events and states of existence to pay attention to history in different ways. Though the interviews took place 3 decades ago, I have detected throughout my own public history experiences that depending on one’s ethnicity, social class, and race, the public memory of 21st century Americans today are very much inspired by an individual’s life experience and/or experiences that happen to Americans in their same racial, social, or economic class. This being said, I do believe that with current movements like Black Lives Matter, Americans of various backgrounds will band together to make sure that the history and lives of past Americans and future citizens will be safeguarded through the knowledge of past wrongdoings and the want for harmony for future Americans.

[5] 


[1] Kitch, Carolyn. Pennsylvania in Public Memory: Reclaiming the Industrial Past. University Park: Penn State Univ Press, 2014.

[4] Rosenzweig, Roy, and David Thelen. The Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.

Comments

  1. Margaret SanfordSeptember 9, 2020 at 12:59 PM

    Great post! I really love the centering of labor in deciding what narratives to include in public memory as well as the proximity to social movements. Really makes me think about #MuseumsRespondtoFerguson and how we are in a pivotal moment to watch history FORM with and outside of "formal" historical production.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #8: Important Discussions of Copyright and Digitization in Archival Spaces

  This week’s discussion in Temple’s Archives and Manuscripts course concerning the protocols of copyright in the archival realm is one that many a researcher might find vital. As a traditional historian, I tend to utilize physical books and monographs. However, I often utilize more contemporary research materials for my papers such as online articles, audio, and countless of other digital sources to input into my papers and assignments. I, like many other researchers, would like to avoid being guilty of copyrighting another’s work and or utilizing a work when it should be restricted or was wrongfully, whether intentionally or unintentionally, made to be used publicly. In Dharma Akmon’s Only With Your Permission: How Rights Respond (Or Don’t Respond) to Requests to Display Archival Materials Online , it is disclosed that many archives try to take multiple measures to ensure that works with complicated rights issues are not digitized to mitigate potential cases of copyright. [1] Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #7: Archival Ethics and Decisions on Document Preservation

  After reading Timothy D. Pyatt’s article The Harding Affair Letters: How One Archivist Took Every Measure Possible To Ensure Their Preservation , I pondered upon the way that the letters were handled by archivist Ken Duckett and also how letters disclosing an affair of someone out of the public eye may have been treated during Duckett’s lifetime. For instance, if Duckett received a box which included documents about the life of someone who was a well-respected figure in their hometown, but not so much on a national or universal scale, would the same measures to preserve the Harding letters be illustrated in the case of this hypothetical figure? Would these measures have been different in Duckett’s time vs. what would occur today? Pyatt discloses that Duckett believed in preserving the letters to allow a fuller understanding of Harding’s narrative. [1] In contrast to the Harding letters, it can be argued that the letters of people who are not affiliated with political or public-r...
Post a Comment
Read more