In Carolyn Kitch’s Pennsylvania
in Public Memory: Reclaiming the Industrial Past, Kitch researches
Pennsylvania’s steel industry from America’s Industrial Revolution era to the
21st century to determine the ways Pennsylvania’s labor history is
recalled today. Through a multi-disciplinary approach of research, oral history,
and ethnography, Kitch discovers the passion and concern placed towards Pennsylvanian
labor history and labor representation. Kitch found that by making history
relatable, pertinent, and noticeable today, Pennsylvanian historical
sites succeeded in capturing visitor attention. One site, the Heritage
Discovery Center, created connections from past citizens to people today by
allowing visitors upon entry to select a card presenting an immigrant whose
story they could follow throughout the site[1]. With personal attention
given to past Pennsylvanian immigrants, the museum succeeded in producing an interesting
and sentimental way in which the public could not only view history but relate
to the everyday struggles of people making a life for themselves.
Within the article How
Do We Define Public History, the NCHP provides descriptions of the practice
of public history. The NCHP states that public historians try to make public
history useful and relevant in the eyes of the public and that many take a collaborative
approach to research and present history [2]. I perceived in Kitch’s research
of Pennsylvanian labor a very collective means to unveil public memory. Her inclusiveness
of historical places ranging from large corporations like Yuengling who give
visitors tours to show the craftsmanship of their bottles to small-scale
attention like visiting rural Pennsylvania to connect with past laborers who
relied on rural life to sustain the state are influential; each example successfully
encapsulates the consideration Pennsylvanians show towards labor history and
the measures to extend its existence in the state.
[3]
Rosenzweig and Thelen’s book The Presence
of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life presents a series of
phone call interviews in the 90s between college students and random Americans which
revealed details of Americans’ outlook on history. The interviewees were asked questions
like which American historical figures and events were important/unimportant to
them, which life events remind the interviewees of history, what historical
narratives should be taught in American society, and which histories are most significant
to American society. With these interviews, Rosenzweig and Thelen found some
very notable trends of the interviewees, such as White interviewees believing
that American society was declining, whereas African Americans and Native
Americans focused on historical events which brought their communities progress[4]. The findings of certain
historical narratives and people being more important to one group than another
suggests that Americans of diverse groups are often inspired through personal
life events and states of existence to pay attention to history in different
ways. Though the interviews took place 3 decades ago, I have detected
throughout my own public history experiences that depending on one’s ethnicity,
social class, and race, the public memory of 21st century Americans
today are very much inspired by an individual’s life experience and/or
experiences that happen to Americans in their same racial, social, or economic class.
This being said, I do believe that with current movements like Black Lives Matter,
Americans of various backgrounds will band together to make sure that the
history and lives of past Americans and future citizens will be safeguarded through
the knowledge of past wrongdoings and the want for harmony for future
Americans.
[1] Kitch, Carolyn. Pennsylvania in Public Memory: Reclaiming the Industrial Past. University Park: Penn State Univ Press, 2014.
[2] NCPH: “About the Field,”: https://ncph.org/what-is-public-history/about-the-field/.
[4] Rosenzweig, Roy, and David Thelen. The Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
Great post! I really love the centering of labor in deciding what narratives to include in public memory as well as the proximity to social movements. Really makes me think about #MuseumsRespondtoFerguson and how we are in a pivotal moment to watch history FORM with and outside of "formal" historical production.
ReplyDelete