Poly McKenna-Cress and
Janet Kamien’s Creating Exhibitions provides it’s readers with an extensive
and careful examination of what the process of creating museum exhibition
entails as well as suggestions as to how to efficiently collaborate with others
to create exhibitions. The reasoning in which the authors have for their
process of exhibition creation and execution are backed up with actual
exhibitions, experiences detailed by museum exhibition creators, and their success
or hardships which ensued while taking on the exhibition creation process. I was
happy that even though their book often states how important team member collaboration
is for a successful exhibition process, Mckenna-Cress and Kamien advocate that
the visitor is the most important collaborator[1]. This statement is such an
important one because even in 2020, museums still struggle to put the desires
and needs of their visitors at heart. It can be argued that a museum or
historic site does not need to adhere to every single suggestion or want that visitors
may have, but it is very important to take into consideration a good majority
of what a community likes, dislikes, or can learn from museum exhibition. On
the same note, when speaking about the subject matter of exhibition’s, the
authors spend considerable attention on how an exhibit's content and labels can
either hinder or accentuate the educational experience of the public. They propose
that often time in the exhibition creation process, there are issues between museum
personnel who know a lot about a subject matter and those who want to “dumb
down” the material for the audience to easily grasp[2]. I think that this may be
a more common issue than the average museum-goer would realize, and though skirmishes
between museum staff about museum labels is an internal issue, I have found that
some museum labels could definitely be chiseled down so that museum-goers of
all education levels and interests can find interest in and enjoy museum
exhibitions and their content. Nothing is worse than going to an exhibit and
spending more than half of your time taking in long-winded labels instead of
pondering equally on artifacts and label information!
Margaret Middleton’s talk
about her experience creating children’s exhibitions is equally as enticing and
educational. Middleton provides the listener with her approach to children’s
exhibition and the ways in which children’s exhibitions are integral to a child’s
education as well as family involvement in child development. Something that I
appreciated from Middleton’s exhibition creation practices is her inclusion of
items that help hone the skills of children like spoons to promote using
utensils during mealtime or providing a hide-away space for children to practice
independence that can also be accessible to families outside of the museum
space[4]. Not only does the inclusion
of items and spaces like this provide a fun environment in the museum, but they
can help guide a parent in their own child-rearing practices as they examine their
children playing and learning in the museum. I have not had many experiences educating
children inside or outside of a museum space, and I am sure that public
historians such as myself could benefit from taking into consideration the significance
of educational, accessible items such as those present in Middleton’s exhibitions
to promote child development with the youth around us.
Comments
Post a Comment