Skip to main content

Statement of Purpose Studies in American Material Culture

 

My name is Jeanette Bendolph and I am a MA student of Temple University’s Public History program. I received my B.A. in History and minors in Africana studies and Museum Studies from the University of Delaware (UD) in 2019. During my undergraduate career, I completed internships and research in the state of Delaware pertinent to my historical and career interest. My sophomore year, I interned at the Delaware Historical Society in which I created a program for junior high students to evaluate changes over time of Delaware’s laws of eminent domain, immigration, and segregation. The following year, I participated in UD’s Summer Scholars program in which I researched and crafted a PowerPoint which detailed the social and political climate of Victorian Era Britain for its Black citizens. As a senior, I interned at the New Castle Historical Society in New Castle, DE and researched, curated, and created an exhibition which detailed the early childhood development practices of Delawareans of the 19th and 20th century. After completing my Public History degree, I wish to become a museum interpreter and/or an exhibition designer.

By taking the course Studies in American Material Culture, I hope to broaden my knowledge in matters of era, design, origin, and usage regarding various historical artifacts. For example, I would love to be able to examine a chair and talk about its possible place of creation, a society, person, or community(s) that may have or continue to use the chair, and how this item may mean something completely different to another society. Likewise, I have always been highly interested in fashion, and though this course may not specifically hone in on artifacts like jewelry and clothing, I have always wanted to take time and examine certain objects of interest such as a vintage diamond necklace or a 19th century ballgown and decipher what materials it may be made of, what women may have worn the dress, how it is stored to retain its fabric and structure, and other questions about the period that particular dress may have been worn.

The object I have chosen to study and share with my peers will be a CAA Championships medal in which I earned during my last year of collegiate athletics.

           

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...

Post #8: Important Discussions of Copyright and Digitization in Archival Spaces

  This week’s discussion in Temple’s Archives and Manuscripts course concerning the protocols of copyright in the archival realm is one that many a researcher might find vital. As a traditional historian, I tend to utilize physical books and monographs. However, I often utilize more contemporary research materials for my papers such as online articles, audio, and countless of other digital sources to input into my papers and assignments. I, like many other researchers, would like to avoid being guilty of copyrighting another’s work and or utilizing a work when it should be restricted or was wrongfully, whether intentionally or unintentionally, made to be used publicly. In Dharma Akmon’s Only With Your Permission: How Rights Respond (Or Don’t Respond) to Requests to Display Archival Materials Online , it is disclosed that many archives try to take multiple measures to ensure that works with complicated rights issues are not digitized to mitigate potential cases of copyright. [1] Th...

Post #7: Archival Ethics and Decisions on Document Preservation

  After reading Timothy D. Pyatt’s article The Harding Affair Letters: How One Archivist Took Every Measure Possible To Ensure Their Preservation , I pondered upon the way that the letters were handled by archivist Ken Duckett and also how letters disclosing an affair of someone out of the public eye may have been treated during Duckett’s lifetime. For instance, if Duckett received a box which included documents about the life of someone who was a well-respected figure in their hometown, but not so much on a national or universal scale, would the same measures to preserve the Harding letters be illustrated in the case of this hypothetical figure? Would these measures have been different in Duckett’s time vs. what would occur today? Pyatt discloses that Duckett believed in preserving the letters to allow a fuller understanding of Harding’s narrative. [1] In contrast to the Harding letters, it can be argued that the letters of people who are not affiliated with political or public-r...