Skip to main content

It's a Bird! It's a Plane! Its a Printer Paper Airplane?: Questioning the Value and Process of Paper Airplane Craftsmanship

            


            It honestly took me three attempts to craft a plane like the plane within the directions. To craft my paper airplane, or should I say paper airplanes, I used blank sheets of printer paper. The first step that I took was to fold the paper in half (I folded it so that the plane’s width would have a horizontal length over 9 inches). The next step that I took was to flip the paper over and to take a corner of my folded rectangle and to fold this corner over, making a small triangle over top of the original rectangle fold. Next, I took the corner opposite of the triangular fold and made the same triangle shape as I folded this corner over the rectangle base. To follow these steps, I started to structure the wings of my paper aircraft. My first step to make the wings was to fold the paper again in half so that I could only see one side of the plane. Then, I proceeded to take the side facing me and made another fold of the entire horizonal slit of the plane. I then turned the plane to the opposite side and repeated this on the side that had not yet been folded. The plane flies well, if I do say so myself!

If I came across this airplane as a historical artifact, I would ask questions like: Who made this plane? Why would someone make an airplane using printer paper? Did they have any other resources on hand to make an airplane, yet they chose printer paper? Since I made three attempts to fold together a paper airplane, I might even ask how much time it took to craft said plane. I would say that questioning what resources were available to the airplane craftsmen/craftswoman is important, in that by asking this question, a historian might be able to answer what material the person valued, or thought was ideal to take on this task. Likewise, the maker of the plane may have used the printer paper to make the plane not for a perceived high value of printer paper, but because they themselves or the society they lived in thought that this was a form of paper or crafting resources that was the least valued. Some artifacts are made from items that people usually dispose of, so it would be important to not assume right away that an artifact was crafted from the most valued resources. For example, I am a proponent of recycled materials, and though some people dispose of newspapers, water bottles, and other recycle materials in a means to be rid of them for good, I have owned a pencil, a bag, a notebook, and other items which were made from recycled materials.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #8: Important Discussions of Copyright and Digitization in Archival Spaces

  This week’s discussion in Temple’s Archives and Manuscripts course concerning the protocols of copyright in the archival realm is one that many a researcher might find vital. As a traditional historian, I tend to utilize physical books and monographs. However, I often utilize more contemporary research materials for my papers such as online articles, audio, and countless of other digital sources to input into my papers and assignments. I, like many other researchers, would like to avoid being guilty of copyrighting another’s work and or utilizing a work when it should be restricted or was wrongfully, whether intentionally or unintentionally, made to be used publicly. In Dharma Akmon’s Only With Your Permission: How Rights Respond (Or Don’t Respond) to Requests to Display Archival Materials Online , it is disclosed that many archives try to take multiple measures to ensure that works with complicated rights issues are not digitized to mitigate potential cases of copyright. [1] Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #7: Archival Ethics and Decisions on Document Preservation

  After reading Timothy D. Pyatt’s article The Harding Affair Letters: How One Archivist Took Every Measure Possible To Ensure Their Preservation , I pondered upon the way that the letters were handled by archivist Ken Duckett and also how letters disclosing an affair of someone out of the public eye may have been treated during Duckett’s lifetime. For instance, if Duckett received a box which included documents about the life of someone who was a well-respected figure in their hometown, but not so much on a national or universal scale, would the same measures to preserve the Harding letters be illustrated in the case of this hypothetical figure? Would these measures have been different in Duckett’s time vs. what would occur today? Pyatt discloses that Duckett believed in preserving the letters to allow a fuller understanding of Harding’s narrative. [1] In contrast to the Harding letters, it can be argued that the letters of people who are not affiliated with political or public-r...
Post a Comment
Read more