Skip to main content

Thick Description

       This CAA Outdoor Track & Field medal (CAA standing for Colonial Athletic Association) is a medal gifted to collegiate athletes who compete in sports within universities on the East Coast of America. This specific medal, a medal given to the winner within CAA competitions, is of a gold tone with a reflective backside; one could see, with a very blurry reflection, the image of their own face or surroundings while looking at the backside of the medal. The frontside of the medal has the design of two circles: one circle is gold and a bit smaller than the surrounding circle, a navy-blue circle, which lies on the outside of the medal. Written overtop of the middle circle are the letters “CAA” which slightly move into the outer navy-blue circle. Near the top of the middle “A” are a few blemishes of a grayish color. The same grayish marks are apparent towards the bottom of the middle circle as well. On the top of the outer navy-blue circle, the words “Outdoor Track & Field” are inscribed. On the opposite side of this same circle, the word “Championship” is inscribed. On the backside of the medal are the words “2019 Women’s Outdoor Track & Field 800 Meter Run Champion” in very slim lettering. Attached to the medal is a navy-blue strap which is held together to the medal by two small gold rings which are inserted through an enclosed hole at the top of the medal. The navy-blue strap is about an inch and a half wide and has the Acronym “CAA” colored in white lettering which is placed across the strap at least five times.

.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #8: Important Discussions of Copyright and Digitization in Archival Spaces

  This week’s discussion in Temple’s Archives and Manuscripts course concerning the protocols of copyright in the archival realm is one that many a researcher might find vital. As a traditional historian, I tend to utilize physical books and monographs. However, I often utilize more contemporary research materials for my papers such as online articles, audio, and countless of other digital sources to input into my papers and assignments. I, like many other researchers, would like to avoid being guilty of copyrighting another’s work and or utilizing a work when it should be restricted or was wrongfully, whether intentionally or unintentionally, made to be used publicly. In Dharma Akmon’s Only With Your Permission: How Rights Respond (Or Don’t Respond) to Requests to Display Archival Materials Online , it is disclosed that many archives try to take multiple measures to ensure that works with complicated rights issues are not digitized to mitigate potential cases of copyright. [1] Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #7: Archival Ethics and Decisions on Document Preservation

  After reading Timothy D. Pyatt’s article The Harding Affair Letters: How One Archivist Took Every Measure Possible To Ensure Their Preservation , I pondered upon the way that the letters were handled by archivist Ken Duckett and also how letters disclosing an affair of someone out of the public eye may have been treated during Duckett’s lifetime. For instance, if Duckett received a box which included documents about the life of someone who was a well-respected figure in their hometown, but not so much on a national or universal scale, would the same measures to preserve the Harding letters be illustrated in the case of this hypothetical figure? Would these measures have been different in Duckett’s time vs. what would occur today? Pyatt discloses that Duckett believed in preserving the letters to allow a fuller understanding of Harding’s narrative. [1] In contrast to the Harding letters, it can be argued that the letters of people who are not affiliated with political or public-r...
Post a Comment
Read more