Skip to main content

Analyzing a 20th Century Medallist Advertisement

 My goal for this week’s workshop was to find an American advertisement of the early 20th century (preferably between 1900-1940) concerning commemorative and/or war medals. However, I was unsuccessful in finding an advertisement with these specific traits. My speculation for this is that because the U.S. did not enter the Great War until 1917, the year before its end, there may be a lesser amount of distinctively American advertisements concerning these items. For this reason, finding advertisements for my item proved challenging. However, I did manage to find an advertisement of a company called “John Pinches Medallist LTD.” which was founded by two 19th century British citizens by the name of John Pinches and William Wyon. Though Pinches and Wyon established the Business in Britain, it would soon be bought by the American company “Franklin Mint” located in Pennsylvania[1]. To wrap up this backstory, the company is known for their production of Great War medals, one of them being the Croix de Guerre, a medal that I have expressed interest with due to its relevancy to the 369th Regiment of New York.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     [2]


To analyze this advertisement with the strategies of Barthes, I would like to first examine the advertisements labels, wording, and writing, which falls under the linguistic message. I am not too knowledgeable of the currency in which British citizens utilized during the time that this medal was made, but I believe the currency present on this image is that of British pounds. If someone were to look at this with no concept of British currency, it may be hard to decipher exactly what is being placed on the advertisement and the advertisement’s message. In terms of symbols on this advertisement, the Churchill medal, I would argue, takes up a considerable chunk of the upper right corner. In this case, I think that John Pinches Medallist LTD. wants to incite attention from consumers to the art of the medal as well as the prominent figure on the medal. The abundant amount of space given to the medal as well as its raised position on the piece is a signifying technique in which Barthes might analyze.

There is no apparent message in the advertisement, at least not of a linguistic nature, which places the work of John Pinches Medallist LTD. over other medallist of Britain or anywhere else in the world. However, I would say that perhaps the abundant amount of information on the ad pertaining to medal prices, available elements to craft a medal through the company, and presence of Prime Minister Winston Churchill is the “non-coded” technique in which Barthes relays in her article. Though the company does not outwardly say “you want us over every other medallist organization around”, it may be that the design and information on the this advertisement is indeed the company’s way of coding and that viewers should choose them over anyone else.



[1]Alyson Wilson, Pressing Time in the history of the Commemorative Medal, (Catford: South London Press, 2017), https://claphamsociety.com/Articles/article19-pressing-time-history-commemorative-medal.html.

[2] This is the advertisement from John Pinches Medallist LTD. including a medal of Prime Minister Winston Churchill: https://claphamsociety.com/Articles/article19-pressing-time-history-commemorative-medal.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...

Post #8: Important Discussions of Copyright and Digitization in Archival Spaces

  This week’s discussion in Temple’s Archives and Manuscripts course concerning the protocols of copyright in the archival realm is one that many a researcher might find vital. As a traditional historian, I tend to utilize physical books and monographs. However, I often utilize more contemporary research materials for my papers such as online articles, audio, and countless of other digital sources to input into my papers and assignments. I, like many other researchers, would like to avoid being guilty of copyrighting another’s work and or utilizing a work when it should be restricted or was wrongfully, whether intentionally or unintentionally, made to be used publicly. In Dharma Akmon’s Only With Your Permission: How Rights Respond (Or Don’t Respond) to Requests to Display Archival Materials Online , it is disclosed that many archives try to take multiple measures to ensure that works with complicated rights issues are not digitized to mitigate potential cases of copyright. [1] Th...

Post #7: Archival Ethics and Decisions on Document Preservation

  After reading Timothy D. Pyatt’s article The Harding Affair Letters: How One Archivist Took Every Measure Possible To Ensure Their Preservation , I pondered upon the way that the letters were handled by archivist Ken Duckett and also how letters disclosing an affair of someone out of the public eye may have been treated during Duckett’s lifetime. For instance, if Duckett received a box which included documents about the life of someone who was a well-respected figure in their hometown, but not so much on a national or universal scale, would the same measures to preserve the Harding letters be illustrated in the case of this hypothetical figure? Would these measures have been different in Duckett’s time vs. what would occur today? Pyatt discloses that Duckett believed in preserving the letters to allow a fuller understanding of Harding’s narrative. [1] In contrast to the Harding letters, it can be argued that the letters of people who are not affiliated with political or public-r...