Skip to main content

A New Avenue of Research: Analyzing the Usage of the Terms "Slave" and "Enslaved"

 Hours: 77.5

Last week, I continued to focus my research efforts on the background history of the JDP and to find as much information about the people who were enslaved, indentured, or free at this location during the 18th and 19th centuries. However, after receiving a voice message from my research partner Sakinaa at the beginning of that week, I added a new task unto my inclusive history researcher duties. In Sakinaa’s message, I was informed that she and I are being asked by Annie, JDP’s site interpreter, to analyze the ways that the words “slave” and “enslavement” have been utilized in historic documents about the JDP. To analyze the usage of said terms, we might look into matters such as the context in which these words are or are not used, who used these terms, which documents include such terms, and other situations and realities that may help progress our research and knowledge.

Tomorrow will be my first research visit to the JDP, and my first trip that I will take to a site to complete research as a member of HCA. Annie and I have corresponded via email about what we believe will be the best documents to view while at the JDP, and because there are many at the site which concern Black Americans, she will draw out ones written in the 18th and 19th century that concern my research. Though this trip will help broaden my background knowledge of the JDP, I can also use it to continue my study of the ways that “slave” and “enslavement” were used by whomever documented incidents regarding American slavery. Though I have just recently started this segment of my research, I do believe that looking into these terms and where they can be found may lead Sakinaa and I to a potentially ground-breaking discovery about the JDP, Delaware, and the entire system which legalized the enslavement of Black Americans.

I will be off-site for most of this week, so I will primarily be completing research remotely. In the future, my supervisor Vertie and I intend to plan more research trips where I will visit archives, repositories, and other sites with sources that will benefit JDP site members as they continue to relay the story of the JDP and the people who labored here, voluntarily and involuntarily.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #8: Important Discussions of Copyright and Digitization in Archival Spaces

  This week’s discussion in Temple’s Archives and Manuscripts course concerning the protocols of copyright in the archival realm is one that many a researcher might find vital. As a traditional historian, I tend to utilize physical books and monographs. However, I often utilize more contemporary research materials for my papers such as online articles, audio, and countless of other digital sources to input into my papers and assignments. I, like many other researchers, would like to avoid being guilty of copyrighting another’s work and or utilizing a work when it should be restricted or was wrongfully, whether intentionally or unintentionally, made to be used publicly. In Dharma Akmon’s Only With Your Permission: How Rights Respond (Or Don’t Respond) to Requests to Display Archival Materials Online , it is disclosed that many archives try to take multiple measures to ensure that works with complicated rights issues are not digitized to mitigate potential cases of copyright. [1] Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #7: Archival Ethics and Decisions on Document Preservation

  After reading Timothy D. Pyatt’s article The Harding Affair Letters: How One Archivist Took Every Measure Possible To Ensure Their Preservation , I pondered upon the way that the letters were handled by archivist Ken Duckett and also how letters disclosing an affair of someone out of the public eye may have been treated during Duckett’s lifetime. For instance, if Duckett received a box which included documents about the life of someone who was a well-respected figure in their hometown, but not so much on a national or universal scale, would the same measures to preserve the Harding letters be illustrated in the case of this hypothetical figure? Would these measures have been different in Duckett’s time vs. what would occur today? Pyatt discloses that Duckett believed in preserving the letters to allow a fuller understanding of Harding’s narrative. [1] In contrast to the Harding letters, it can be argued that the letters of people who are not affiliated with political or public-r...
Post a Comment
Read more