Skip to main content

Standing Firm to Distinguish Between "Enslaved" and "Servant"

 

Hours: 107

            Last week, I had the opportunity to utilize the card catalogues at the JDP in order to see what the site does and does not have on file concerning the enslaved, indentured, and free people who labored here in the 18th and 19th centuries. Because the only day that I could complete research in person last week was on a Tuesday and due to travel, a good majority of my research following last Tuesday was completed remotely. Though I have searched for documents online concerning my research topic, I again noted the dearth of information available online for my research and relied on secondary sources to gain knowledge about slavery in Delaware. Also, I am still being as attentive as I can be to the ways that “slave” and “enslavement” are utilized throughout the documents that I have come across, secondary or primary.

After reviewing more secondary sources, I saw that the push to regard people who were enslaved during the 18th and 19th centuries was not one with a large focus. In fact, one of the sources that I focused on for this search was a biography of John Dickinson written by Milton E. Flowers titled John Dickinson: Conservative Revolutionary. Milton uses the words “slave” and “servant” throughout the book, though he speaks about the same people when using the terms interchangeably. I took into account that this book was published in 1983, and with this in mind, I tried to reflect on what conversations were being had at this time when determining the proper context to label someone as a “slave” or a “servant” vs. the conversations that are being had about this situation today. I will outwardly say that there is a distinct difference between someone who was enslaved and someone who was an indentured servant, so I believe (and will push for through my research) the correct labeling of historical figures who labored under distinct and varying circumstances.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...

Post #6: Being Attentive to Culturally-Sensitive Collections in Special Collection and Archival Spaces

  In Ellen M. Ryan’s Identifying Culturally Sensitive American Indian Material in a Non-tribal Institution (2014), the accessibility to the contents of a collection pertaining to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho found within the Special Collections and Archives of Idaho State University are called into question. This collection, the “J.A. Youngren Papers,” includes photographs of Shoshone-Bannock practices such as the “Sun Dance” (a ceremony of the Great Plains tribes) taken and acquired by the university in the early 20 th century without the consent of Shoshone-Bannock members. [1] In 2013, an undergraduate student and sun dancer tasked with processing and housing these photographs took note of the rituals captured within the photographs and the problematic nature of displaying these photographs online without the consent of tribal members. He thus brought this concern up to the Head of Special Collections of ISU and the photos were soon after ...

Post #9: Examining Avenues for Archival Outreach to the Public

  This week, my classmates and I discussed the myriad of ways that archival and special collections staff can advocate for the vitalness of their work as well as the ways that they may take action to connect with the public through outreach activities. This conversation reminded me of the appraisal activity that I completed while at Temple’s SCRC this past October. During this activity, I looked through the “Arthur Hall Papers”: a collection that contained papers and documents about the renowned choreographer of African dance, Arthur Hall, who traveled around Philadelphia to teach young children African dance within schools and other spaces of youth learning. With the size of Philadelphia and the variety of programs that take place today centered on youth learning and community activities, could collections like the Arthur Hall Papers be utilized to show Temple’s surrounding communities how the SCRC’s retainment of papers like these are integral to the success and fruitfulness of f...