Hours: 107
Last
week, I had the opportunity to utilize the card catalogues at the JDP in order
to see what the site does and does not have on file concerning the enslaved, indentured,
and free people who labored here in the 18th and 19th
centuries. Because the only day that I could complete research in person last week
was on a Tuesday and due to travel, a good majority of my research following last
Tuesday was completed remotely. Though I have searched for documents online
concerning my research topic, I again noted the dearth of information available
online for my research and relied on secondary sources to gain knowledge about
slavery in Delaware. Also, I am still being as attentive as I can be to the
ways that “slave” and “enslavement” are utilized throughout the documents that
I have come across, secondary or primary.
After reviewing more
secondary sources, I saw that the push to regard people who were enslaved during
the 18th and 19th centuries was not one with a large focus.
In fact, one of the sources that I focused on for this search was a biography of
John Dickinson written by Milton E. Flowers titled John Dickinson:
Conservative Revolutionary. Milton uses the words “slave” and “servant” throughout
the book, though he speaks about the same people when using the terms
interchangeably. I took into account that this book was published in 1983, and
with this in mind, I tried to reflect on what conversations were being had at
this time when determining the proper context to label someone as a “slave” or
a “servant” vs. the conversations that are being had about this situation today.
I will outwardly say that there is a distinct difference between someone who
was enslaved and someone who was an indentured servant, so I believe (and will
push for through my research) the correct labeling of historical figures who
labored under distinct and varying circumstances.
Comments
Post a Comment