Skip to main content

Standing Firm to Distinguish Between "Enslaved" and "Servant"

 

Hours: 107

            Last week, I had the opportunity to utilize the card catalogues at the JDP in order to see what the site does and does not have on file concerning the enslaved, indentured, and free people who labored here in the 18th and 19th centuries. Because the only day that I could complete research in person last week was on a Tuesday and due to travel, a good majority of my research following last Tuesday was completed remotely. Though I have searched for documents online concerning my research topic, I again noted the dearth of information available online for my research and relied on secondary sources to gain knowledge about slavery in Delaware. Also, I am still being as attentive as I can be to the ways that “slave” and “enslavement” are utilized throughout the documents that I have come across, secondary or primary.

After reviewing more secondary sources, I saw that the push to regard people who were enslaved during the 18th and 19th centuries was not one with a large focus. In fact, one of the sources that I focused on for this search was a biography of John Dickinson written by Milton E. Flowers titled John Dickinson: Conservative Revolutionary. Milton uses the words “slave” and “servant” throughout the book, though he speaks about the same people when using the terms interchangeably. I took into account that this book was published in 1983, and with this in mind, I tried to reflect on what conversations were being had at this time when determining the proper context to label someone as a “slave” or a “servant” vs. the conversations that are being had about this situation today. I will outwardly say that there is a distinct difference between someone who was enslaved and someone who was an indentured servant, so I believe (and will push for through my research) the correct labeling of historical figures who labored under distinct and varying circumstances.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #8: Important Discussions of Copyright and Digitization in Archival Spaces

  This week’s discussion in Temple’s Archives and Manuscripts course concerning the protocols of copyright in the archival realm is one that many a researcher might find vital. As a traditional historian, I tend to utilize physical books and monographs. However, I often utilize more contemporary research materials for my papers such as online articles, audio, and countless of other digital sources to input into my papers and assignments. I, like many other researchers, would like to avoid being guilty of copyrighting another’s work and or utilizing a work when it should be restricted or was wrongfully, whether intentionally or unintentionally, made to be used publicly. In Dharma Akmon’s Only With Your Permission: How Rights Respond (Or Don’t Respond) to Requests to Display Archival Materials Online , it is disclosed that many archives try to take multiple measures to ensure that works with complicated rights issues are not digitized to mitigate potential cases of copyright. [1] Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Post #7: Archival Ethics and Decisions on Document Preservation

  After reading Timothy D. Pyatt’s article The Harding Affair Letters: How One Archivist Took Every Measure Possible To Ensure Their Preservation , I pondered upon the way that the letters were handled by archivist Ken Duckett and also how letters disclosing an affair of someone out of the public eye may have been treated during Duckett’s lifetime. For instance, if Duckett received a box which included documents about the life of someone who was a well-respected figure in their hometown, but not so much on a national or universal scale, would the same measures to preserve the Harding letters be illustrated in the case of this hypothetical figure? Would these measures have been different in Duckett’s time vs. what would occur today? Pyatt discloses that Duckett believed in preserving the letters to allow a fuller understanding of Harding’s narrative. [1] In contrast to the Harding letters, it can be argued that the letters of people who are not affiliated with political or public-r...
Post a Comment
Read more