Skip to main content

Post #1: A few Thoughts on the Impact of Digital Archives

 

After reading Ian Milligan’s Historians’ Archival Research Looks Quite Different in the Digital Age (2019), a few points made within this article concerning digital archives vs. physical and traditional archives led me to think about the variety of ways that archives do and will impact our society. Milligan points out the fact that before digital archives existed, researchers relied heavily on documents and resources that were either tangible or available for an in-person viewing for research, but with digital archives, there is often an abundance of material to research from one’s digital device.[1] As technology has positively impacted many facets of academia, it has benefited the many historians, researchers, and scholars who without it might lack access to desired material or would need to take strenuous actions to research certain documents (traveling to another country to review a document, reviewing a document in a highly-confidential facility, etc.). This being said, though digital archives can provide a multitude of material to the public for research, another point that Milligan made was something that struck me as truthful yet is admittingly something I do not think too often about: fabricated resources and media in an archival space.

I tend to not think as often as I should about these fabricated materials due to willing neglect, but because I tend to be too optimistic when looking forward to doing research. Milligan states that the fabrication of images and videos are often due to “deepfakes” which are products of artificial intelligence that can alter images or video clips.[2] I have come across a variety of sources that were indeed not of the original source and/or creator or have been altered from its original copy. These incidents further heighten my will to diligently complete research while being cautious of encountering more deep fakes. Ultimately, I am happy to have come across this definition of deceptive material as I have never heard the term “deep fake” before. I am glad that by including this definition within his article, Milligan, like many other scholars, are promoting society to be careful when completing research in digital spaces that seem to give us endless access to truthful and reliable sources, but can often include unreliable ones as well. Ultimately, despite the deep fakes, digital archives will continue to shift into one of the most fulfilling and beneficial resources that a researcher and historian can have.



[1] Ian Milligan, Historians’ Archival Research Looks Quite Different in the Digital Age, (The Conversation, 2019), https://theconversation.com/historians-archival-research-looks-quite-different-in-the-digital-age-121096.

[2] Ibid., Historians’ Archival Research.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...

Post #6: Being Attentive to Culturally-Sensitive Collections in Special Collection and Archival Spaces

  In Ellen M. Ryan’s Identifying Culturally Sensitive American Indian Material in a Non-tribal Institution (2014), the accessibility to the contents of a collection pertaining to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho found within the Special Collections and Archives of Idaho State University are called into question. This collection, the “J.A. Youngren Papers,” includes photographs of Shoshone-Bannock practices such as the “Sun Dance” (a ceremony of the Great Plains tribes) taken and acquired by the university in the early 20 th century without the consent of Shoshone-Bannock members. [1] In 2013, an undergraduate student and sun dancer tasked with processing and housing these photographs took note of the rituals captured within the photographs and the problematic nature of displaying these photographs online without the consent of tribal members. He thus brought this concern up to the Head of Special Collections of ISU and the photos were soon after ...

Post #9: Examining Avenues for Archival Outreach to the Public

  This week, my classmates and I discussed the myriad of ways that archival and special collections staff can advocate for the vitalness of their work as well as the ways that they may take action to connect with the public through outreach activities. This conversation reminded me of the appraisal activity that I completed while at Temple’s SCRC this past October. During this activity, I looked through the “Arthur Hall Papers”: a collection that contained papers and documents about the renowned choreographer of African dance, Arthur Hall, who traveled around Philadelphia to teach young children African dance within schools and other spaces of youth learning. With the size of Philadelphia and the variety of programs that take place today centered on youth learning and community activities, could collections like the Arthur Hall Papers be utilized to show Temple’s surrounding communities how the SCRC’s retainment of papers like these are integral to the success and fruitfulness of f...