Skip to main content

Post #1: A few Thoughts on the Impact of Digital Archives

 

After reading Ian Milligan’s Historians’ Archival Research Looks Quite Different in the Digital Age (2019), a few points made within this article concerning digital archives vs. physical and traditional archives led me to think about the variety of ways that archives do and will impact our society. Milligan points out the fact that before digital archives existed, researchers relied heavily on documents and resources that were either tangible or available for an in-person viewing for research, but with digital archives, there is often an abundance of material to research from one’s digital device.[1] As technology has positively impacted many facets of academia, it has benefited the many historians, researchers, and scholars who without it might lack access to desired material or would need to take strenuous actions to research certain documents (traveling to another country to review a document, reviewing a document in a highly-confidential facility, etc.). This being said, though digital archives can provide a multitude of material to the public for research, another point that Milligan made was something that struck me as truthful yet is admittingly something I do not think too often about: fabricated resources and media in an archival space.

I tend to not think as often as I should about these fabricated materials due to willing neglect, but because I tend to be too optimistic when looking forward to doing research. Milligan states that the fabrication of images and videos are often due to “deepfakes” which are products of artificial intelligence that can alter images or video clips.[2] I have come across a variety of sources that were indeed not of the original source and/or creator or have been altered from its original copy. These incidents further heighten my will to diligently complete research while being cautious of encountering more deep fakes. Ultimately, I am happy to have come across this definition of deceptive material as I have never heard the term “deep fake” before. I am glad that by including this definition within his article, Milligan, like many other scholars, are promoting society to be careful when completing research in digital spaces that seem to give us endless access to truthful and reliable sources, but can often include unreliable ones as well. Ultimately, despite the deep fakes, digital archives will continue to shift into one of the most fulfilling and beneficial resources that a researcher and historian can have.



[1] Ian Milligan, Historians’ Archival Research Looks Quite Different in the Digital Age, (The Conversation, 2019), https://theconversation.com/historians-archival-research-looks-quite-different-in-the-digital-age-121096.

[2] Ibid., Historians’ Archival Research.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fortitude, Community, and Vision: the Black Museum Movement from the 1960s to the Present

  [1] In her book From Storefront to Monument: Tracing the Public History of the Black Museum Movement , Andrea A. Burns documents the endeavors of African Americans to establish Black-owned museums in stride and motivated by certain sentiments of the Black Power movement of the 1960s. Focusing primarily on four of the first African American museums in America named The DuSable Museum of African American History, The International Afro-American Museum (IAM), The Anacostia Neighborhood Museum (ANM), and the African American Museum of Philadelphia (AAMP), Burns illustrates how these museums were created and run by African Americans. Some of the historical figures in Burns’ narrative include Margaret (Black artist) and Charles Burroughs, Dr. Charles Wright, and museum director John Kinard who out of grassroot movements and extreme effort formed and oversaw operations they saw fit for reconstructing the representations and presentations of African American history. Burns allows her reade

From Distant Comfort to Submersion: The Morphing of Historical Consciousness and Historical Authenticity in America

     [1] [2] M.J. Rymsza-Pawlowska’s book History Comes Alive: Public History and Popular Culture in the 1970s is a refreshing and perceptive examination of the changing manners in which history was taught, depicted, reenacted, and reflected upon in America from the 1950s to the 1970s. Rymsza-Pawlowska shows these shifts by presenting to her readers America’s earlier traditions to deliver history in a more distance and purely informational manner and America’s change in method which would incite emotions and provide more interactive ways to partake in historical settings [3] . What I found particularly striking and informative in her book was her inclusion of American television series which showed early reluctance to interact deeply with the past and the move of American television productions to present a more involved and sincere narrative of American history in later decades. For instance, she provides the ways in which early American shows such as The Twilight Zone would often

Introduction

  My name is Jeanette Dianne Bendolph and I am an alumna of the University of Delaware. During my undergraduate career, I earned a Bachelor of Arts in History and minors in Museum Studies and Africana Studies. My public history background includes my experience creating a children’s program, curation and creation of an exhibition, and participation in a collegiate history symposium. For my children’s program, I was required to document past Delawarean laws (18 th century to the 20 th century) concerning school desegregation, immigration, and eminent domain in order for kids to compare how citizens reacted towards these laws in the past vs. today. My summer research entailed the political and social climate of Victorian Britain for its Black citizens. The exhibition I created which was placed in the New Castle Historical Society of New Castle, Delaware in 2019 documented the activities which stimulated early childhood development in young New Castle Citizens of the 19 th and 20 th c