This Tuesday’s class
included several discussions about archival access, archival reference, archival
policies, digitization, and other related topics. One discussion that the class
focused in on this session that I find important to highlight was the differences
between a library and an archive. People who are researchers or scholars and or
have careers that require visitations to a library or archive may know the difference
between a library and an archive, but people who do not have history or
research-based careers/have not completed research in these spaces may not. For
this reason, sources which delineate the difference between libraries and
archives such as Laura Schmidt’s article Using Archives: A Guide to
Effective Research and Mary J. Pough’s article The Illusion of
Omniscience: Subject Access and the Reference Archivist are vital to
understanding the differing operations that occur within them. For Schmidt’s
article, not only did she explain the general protocols of archives and a library,
but she produced examples of the varying archives that exist that people can
complete research in. The archives listed were college and university archives,
corporate archives, government archives, historical societies, museum archives,
religious archives, and special collections.[1] I found this detail notable
because it displays the array of options that a researcher has when intending
to complete research. Though some of these archives might have certain policies
that require a researcher to complete prerequisite activities to enter, require
research fees to utilize their archive, or other protocols that might catch a
researcher off guard, it is awesome to know about the multitude of options people
have when it comes to tracking down archives for research.
[1] Laura Schmidt, “Using Archives: A
Guide to Effective Research”: https://www2.archivists.org/usingarchive.
Comments
Post a Comment