Skip to main content

Creative and Meaningful Engagement with the Public

 

In this week’s readings of Hannah Hethmon’s Your Museum Needs a Podcast, Hethmon presents a mode of public communication, podcasting, which can help a broadcaster connect with a community or specific audience. Hethmon explains that though podcasting may appear strange and unorthodox as a means of historic outreach, it is an impactful and lucrative way to give history attention.[1] Hethmon proclaims that ultimately, podcasts that can state their purpose while telling a story are usually the most successful among listeners.[2] I agree with Hethmon in that it is vital to keep the community aware of why certain histories should be of interest to them. I am also aware that though one may try to engage with a certain audience and have an audience’s unwavering attention, the topic at hand may not always engage the audience as intended (some may view material as too radical, sensitive, or boring). In this case, I believe that having a purpose and putting in total effort to the podcast’s production is necessary to successfully attain meaningful outreach and attention from the public.

Joanne Danifo explores history and material culture in her writing Elfreth’s Alley: A work which explores an alley traced back to Colonial America formerly bustling with Pennsylvania merchants and artisans in the 18th century.[3] Danifo then proceeds to explain the negative aftermath of the Industrial Revolution on the alley, and the decline of its residents to follow.[4] This post is super insightful as it gives its readers an example of why histories such as that of Elfreth’s Alley should and can be fought for and that the alley should remain accessible to Pennsylvania’s surrounding community and those who care to preserve it's history to share it with future generations. Unaware of the full history of this alley yet knowing that many Colonial historic sites struggle to include the lives of minority Colonial Americans, I admittingly have skepticism of the inclusiveness of histories being told here. However, I do believe that the historical narratives formerly covered will be unearthed by Pennsylvanians caring to show a holistic history of the alley.

    Studs Terkel’s Working is not only an entertaining read, but a read that exemplifies a very personable and humane way in which Terkel as a 20th century radio broadcaster connected with every-day individuals and made their labor history relatable to the public. Through this piece, the reader experiences the sense of purpose the interviewees feel they have due to their past and current occupations.[5] I believe Terkel did an excellent job of selecting workers of differing walks of life and showing their very human concerns and aspirations. Often, the stories of the workers are juxtaposed to show the differing mindsets of workers in opposite working environments; one very striking comparison being the interview of White police officer Vincent Maher which precedes that of Black Police officer Renault Robertson.[6] Terkel’s effort to interview a variance of people evidences his will to be open with the public about sharing a range of history and connecting with everyone. As some of the issues that are brought up by his interviewees (being mistreated by members of another race and finding hardship working amongst people of a different race) are resounding issues of America’s climate today. 


[1] Hethmon, Hannah. “Your Museum Needs a Podcast”, 2018.

[2] Ibid., “Your Museum Needs a Podcast”.

[3] Danifo, Joanne. “Elfreth’s Alley”, The Encylopedia of Greater Philadelphia, 2012, https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/archive/elfreths-alley/

[4]Ibid. “Elfreth’s Alley”.

[5] Terkel, Studs. “Working”, 1972.

[6] Ibid. 129,137.

Comments

  1. Jeanette, You've hit the central concern with Philadelphia (and many other places) and its colonial and revolutionary period history focus. You haven't here focused on any of the podcast? I hope you got a glimpse of what's ahead.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10: How Can We Promote Diversity and Cordialness In Archival Spaces?

  In the article What’s Wrong with Digital Stewardship: Evaluating the Organization of Digital Preservation Programs from Practitioners’ Perspectives (2020), a study conducted in 2018 unveiled certain issues that archival practitioners found to be hindering the staffing and efficiency of their program’s digital preservation methods. Amongst the thoughts expressed by the participants via interview were concerns about microaggressions, prejudice, and misogyny within their work environments. [1] Though incidents of misogynistic and prejudice behavior are found in a multitude of career pathways, many archives and special collection practitioners today push for diversity of staff within their work and research spaces. In one of these interviews, an anonymous participant pointed out a negative factor of the nature of tenure. The participant stated that due to the tenured status of the practitioner they work with, when they hear said staff member making misogynistic comments towards othe...

Post #6: Being Attentive to Culturally-Sensitive Collections in Special Collection and Archival Spaces

  In Ellen M. Ryan’s Identifying Culturally Sensitive American Indian Material in a Non-tribal Institution (2014), the accessibility to the contents of a collection pertaining to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho found within the Special Collections and Archives of Idaho State University are called into question. This collection, the “J.A. Youngren Papers,” includes photographs of Shoshone-Bannock practices such as the “Sun Dance” (a ceremony of the Great Plains tribes) taken and acquired by the university in the early 20 th century without the consent of Shoshone-Bannock members. [1] In 2013, an undergraduate student and sun dancer tasked with processing and housing these photographs took note of the rituals captured within the photographs and the problematic nature of displaying these photographs online without the consent of tribal members. He thus brought this concern up to the Head of Special Collections of ISU and the photos were soon after ...

Post #5: Fair Compensation: Procuring Well-Deserved Funding for the Employees of Archives and Special Collections

  Chela Scott Weber’s Research and Learning Agenda for Archives, Special, and Distinctive Collections in Research Libraries (2017) extensively explores options to improve the functions and quality of archives and special collections by placing attention on both the collections within these places as well as the skills that archivist, stakeholders, and others who work collections can offer to the public. [1] Weber also proclaims that to improve the innerworkings and missions of special collections and archives, diversity of the workforce as well as a push for accessibility and diverse collections must be prioritized. Weber argues that a blockade to drawing in more employees who want to instate these features is the reality of “soft money” funding: a highly unstable way to maintain employment of archivist and special collection staff. In this case, how can more concrete manners of pay be given to these employees? [2] From my knowledge, though this article was published in 2017, I w...